Corporate venture capital (CVC) has evolved beyond its traditional role as a strategic innovation tool. Today, firms like JetBlue Ventures and BMW i Ventures operate with a level of independence that enables them to compete with traditional VCs while still driving meaningful impact within their parent organizations.
While both firms invest in mobility and transportation, their investment theses, structures, and risk appetites differ significantly. A deep dive into their strategies reveals the nuanced ways CVCs approach industry transformation, sustainability, and long-term capital deployment.
JetBlue Ventures: Balancing Strategy and Financial Returns
A High-Volume, High-Learning Approach
JetBlue Ventures has invested in 55 companies, making it one of the most active airline-backed CVCs. Unlike many corporate funds that start conservatively, JetBlue front-loaded its investments, deploying 10–15 deals in its first year alone. This rapid approach allowed the firm to make mistakes early, refine its thesis, and become more disciplined over time.
“We wanted to learn by doing,” says Stephen Snyder, Managing Director of Operations and Partnerships at JetBlue Ventures. “In the beginning, we made a lot of smaller bets, but as we matured, we became more selective and started writing bigger checks.”
The Strategic Mandate Shift
Initially, JetBlue Ventures leaned heavily strategic, with investments guided by the question:
Could JetBlue see itself using this product in the future?
However, after demonstrating financial successes, the mandate has evolved. Today, investments are still informed by JetBlue's business priorities, but the primary filter is whether an investment can deliver strong financial returns while remaining aligned with the broader travel ecosystem.
“There’s this misconception that CVCs just fund what the parent company wants,” Snyder explains. “We do that, but we also need to be financially competitive. If we’re not seeing solid returns, we’re not doing our job.”
He also emphasized the long-term nature of CVC bets:
"We're not here to chase trends for the sake of it. The best investments aren’t always obvious upfront, and we’ve learned to spot potential where others might overlook it."
This shift is particularly relevant when comparing JetBlue Ventures to United Airlines’ recent aggressive CVC expansion. United’s fund is highly focused on sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and sustainability, whereas JetBlue Ventures maintains a broader, tech-enabled investment portfolio.
Case Study: The Unexpected Value of Event Intelligence
One of JetBlue Ventures’ standout deals wasn’t in aviation hardware or fuel but in data analytics
PredictHQ, originally pitched as a revenue management tool for airlines, helps businesses track events that impact demand—such as concerts, marathons, or conferences. While revenue teams saw limited value, JetBlue’s operations team uncovered a major efficiency use case:
- PredictHQ’s data allowed JetBlue to optimize airport staffing, ensuring TSA and gate agents were prepared for surges in passenger volume.
- During major city events, it helped schedule pilots and crew more efficiently, reducing last-minute delays and flight disruptions.
- It prevented logistical failures, like pilots being stranded due to city-wide road closures (e.g., San Francisco’s Bay to Breakers race).
“The way we found value in PredictHQ had nothing to do with why they originally pitched us,” says Snyder. “That’s why I always tell founders—if your tech is adaptable, be open to unexpected applications.”
BMW i Ventures: Mastering the Mobility Supply Chain
From OEM-Centric to an Independent Fund Model
Unlike JetBlue Ventures, BMW i Ventures operates as an independent fund with BMW as its sole LP. This structure, which transitioned from a balance sheet model in 2017, allows it to move faster and compete with financial VCs.
“We’re structured like an institutional fund, not a corporate department. BMW gives us capital, but we make investment decisions independently.”
Allen Chen, Investor at BMW i Ventures
Rare Earth Elements: A Supply Chain Bet With High Geopolitical Stakes
One of BMW i Ventures' most compelling investments is in rare earth element recycling — a space that is under-discussed yet critical to the automotive industry.
- China controls over 90% of the world’s rare earth supply chain, making Western automakers highly vulnerable.
- Cyclic Materials, a BMW i Ventures portfolio company, specializes in recycling rare earth materials for EV batteries and motors, reducing dependency on newly mined materials.
- Initially a scrappy 18-person team, the company has since scaled to over 50 employees and is positioned to become the largest rare earth recycling facility in North America.
“We don’t just invest in cars—we invest in the raw materials that make mobility possible,” says Chen. “The EV supply chain is the real battlefield.”
He added:
"This isn’t just a sustainability play—it’s a resilience play. Automakers need to secure their supply chains, or they risk production shutdowns when geopolitical tensions rise."
Final Takeaway: The CVC Playbook is Changing
JetBlue Ventures and BMW i Ventures exemplify the evolution of corporate venture capital:
✅ Financial-first thinking over pure strategy
✅ Fewer moonshots, more supply chain dominance
✅ Positioning themselves to outlast industry hype cycles
For mobility startups, securing a CVC partner like JetBlue or BMW means gaining more than just capital—it’s a strategic bet on the future of transportation.
*This discussion was moderated by Anastasia Lykova of Elpis Labs
Comentários